Dr. Randolf Pohl (Max-Planck-Institut f. Quantenoptik): "Measuring the size of the proton"
→
Europe/Berlin
Seminar room K017 (Excellence Cluster Universe)
Seminar room K017
Excellence Cluster Universe
Description
Vortrag im Rahmen einer Berufung
We have recently determined the proton charge radius by laser spectroscopy of
the 2S-2P transition ("Lamb shift") in the exotic muonic hydrogen atom [1,2].
In muonic hydrogen, a negative muon orbits the proton. The 200 times larger
muon mass results in a 200 times smaller Bohr radius in muonic hydrogen,
compared to regular, electronic hydrogen. This in turn results in a 200^3 =
10^7 times larger overlap of the muon's wave function with the nuclear charge
distribution, dramatically enhancing the effects of the finite nuclear size on
the Lamb shift.
Our value of the proton rms charge radius, Rp=0.84087(39) fm, is ten times
more accurate, but 7 sigma discrepant from the world average which is based
on elastic electron-proton scattering and precision spectroscopy of regular
(electronic) hydrogen. This so-called "proton radius puzzle" has sparked
tremendous interest both in atomic and nuclear physics. Possile explanations
include previously unexpected behaviour of the proton and physics beyond the
Standard Model [3].
To shed new light on this discrepancy, we have measured the Lamb shift in
muonic deuterium [4] and extracted a value of the charge radius of the
deuteron. Currently, we are setting up an experiment to measure the Lamb shift
in muonic helium ions. This will improve the accuracy of the charge radii of
all helium isotopes by a factor of ten [5]. In future, spectroscopy of of
muonic lithium, beryllium and boron ions may be used for significantly
improved charge radius value of the lightest isotopes [6].
[1] R. Pohl et al. (CREMA coll.), Nature 466, 213 (2010).
[2] A. Antognini et al. (CREMA coll.), Science 339, 417 (2013).
[3] R. Pohl et al., Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci 63, 175 (2013).
[4] CREMA coll., in preparation.
[5] A. Antognini et al. (CREMA coll.), Can. J. Phys. 89, 47 (2011).
[6] Drake, Byer, PRA 32, 713 (1985).